|
The
initial experiences showed that
we could not expect behaviour change results based on capital
investment and ad hoc interventions alone. Such
strategy proved to be
unsuccessful as initially a lot of street selling continued to flourish despite
the new implemented Markets. Thus more interventions
in capacity building and
awareness programmes were hold, after the promised
comparative advantages of the Markets towards other venues, as well as street
selling were visible and tangible to all.
In an environment were street selling was the norm and no real Market culture in
place, the achievement of integrating 800 out of a total number of 1000 informal
hawkers in an organized hygienic trading space and create enough sense of
ownership to be able to implement a fee structure accepted and paid for by all
is certainly a success, especially in a cultural environment where payments for
services provided
by the GRN was something non of the
beneficiaries where used to before.
Creating
"value
adding" trades
in a sector where previously
most traders
made money by eliminating
overheads and adding small margins to the re-sale of locally purchased goods,
was
another of the major results achieved during the project cycle.
A first
evaluation process and stock of lessons learned was organized by the PC*
in March-2002 in form of a handing over workshop, the delegates were the Market
operators, the Town Management team, the Town Councillors and the Nam/330 Project
team. This kind of approach saw the evaluation as an integral part of the
development or a change process: “reflection-action”. People in this evaluation
form are no more seen as” objects” of evaluation but “subjects” of evaluation
and take a more active role. The methods chosen should enhance
our
capacity to collect and analyse information relevant to
us
and our
situation.
*PC= Project coordinator
|